Support Forum

Is there also an added feature to skip such updates with a timeout (because of pop-ups, etc. as your ghostscript example above) and continue with the rest of the packages that may not require interaction, then log such exceptions?

Just in case it is needed for you to be able to assist with this issue I am going to add screenshots for the outputs for the update command and the scan command.

No offense, but after nearly a year of paying for C4A and it not functioning as expected, I believe we will hold off on any additions at this time. I deployed the framework again...although it was already deployed. I then made sure the agent was online and not asleep. I then attempted to use the (up...

So, most of our app packages have installed, but have not updated. Chocolatey itself even is on some very old versions. I have poured through your scripts annd logs and cannot find where they issue an update command. I have a 2-line shell script in automate that simply runs Chico update all -y that ...

Is approving the app a 2-step process for the whole client or for each machine? I would expect that it be for the whole client, as if you click the approve apps button, it says 'enable or disable for the client'. For example, if I have approved 7zip.install globally, do I only need to add it to the ...

Shannon... I sent you an email regarding the update question... and thought I would pick back up here... From: <sanderson@plugins4automate.com> Date: Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 8:26 AM Subject: RE: Chocolatey To: Linley, Patrick (mstech) <patrick@mstech.info> Patrick, I will be glad to give you some assist...

I believe it would definitely be a move in the right direction... also, I believe something like a dataview showing the whole list of machines at a site - with a column for each approved package, and the rows for each package indicated as 'installed' 'not installed' 'not attempted' 'failed' etc. wou...

We need a view in the plugin to show us the inconsistencies between machines at a client site. The site I have been struggling with testing from day one with 3.5 is looking better for sure, but even though each machine shows green for 'current' there are still inconsistencies. I realize that it may ...

It is quite common for packages to create an empty directory but still have a file of some sort in the root directory. Chocolatey created the 2.2.2 folder but does not put anything in it as the entire process to install or upgrade is a single ps1 file, typically in root. Gotcha, but the general sha...

For the 3.5 version, c4a created (I believe) a 'chocolatey' folder under the location 'script and template variables drive'. I see that 3.6 has created a 'chocolatey.2.2.2' folder, but it is empty and all of the packages are getting dumped into the root of the 'script and template variables drive' s...